Collector Aditi Garg of Mandsaur Leads in the Execution of Government Schemes, While Collector Somwanshi of Sidhi Falls Short
Shivpuri and Ashoknagar performed below average in addressing malnutrition; the government assessed district performance in a number of areas.
prativad 
When it comes to carrying out the state and federal government's plans, Mandsaur district leads the way.
Jhabua, Betul, Khargone, and Neemuch have all done the same.
When it comes to implementing the programs that the state and the center have started, Sidhi, Singrauli, Gwalior, Umaria, and Dindori lag considerably behind neighboring districts.
The Mandsaur district's collector, Aditi Garg, has performed better than others in carrying out government initiatives.
On the other hand, the performance of Sidhi district has been poor in carrying out the schemes. The collector of Sidhi is Swarochish Somwanshi.
Marks were fixed for a district for implementing state and central schemes. The state government has fixed criteria for evaluating the performance of a district.
According to the criteria, five top-performing and five below-average-performing districts have been selected.
Balaghat, Jhabua, Mandsaur, Narmadapuram, and Barwani have been ahead of others in implementing schemes related to checking malnutrition.
The performance of Damoh, Ashoknagar, Sidhi, Vidisha, and Shivpuri was not up to the mark.
The performance of Chhatarpur, Ashoknagar, Guna, Dhar and Agar Malwa was better than others in terms of maintaining cowsheds. But Ujjain, Datia, Shivpuri, and Satna did not perform well in this regard.
In case of forest rights, Barwani, Umaria, Khargone, Sidhi and Shahdol have been among the districts which have long-pending claims.
In terms of revenue case disposal, Jhabua, Balaghat, Singrauli, Mandla and Betul were ahead of others. The performance of Bhopal, Anuppur, Panna, Sidhi, and Tikamgarh was not up to the mark.
In mutation cases, Betul, Singrauli, Neemuch, Harda and Chhindwara were on top.
But the performance of Jabalpur, Anuppur, Ratlam, Panna and Chhatarpur was below average.
In collecting revenues, Dindori, Anuppur, Narmadapuram, Chhatarpur, and Sidhi performed well. But Shivpuri, Agar-Malwa, Sagar, Sheopur, and Barwani did not perform better in this regard.
Khargone, Harda, Shahdol, Sehore, and Dindori performed well in implementing Swamitva Yojna.
The performance of Morena, Rajgarh, Tikamgarh, Niwari and Gwalior was not on expected lines.
Shahdol ahead, Dhar lags behind in PM Housing Scheme
Shahdol, Katni, Balaghat, Alirajpur, and Panna have done better than other districts in implementing PM Housing Scheme. The performance of Khandwa, Ujjain, Dewas, and Dhar was not up to the mark.
School education also evaluated
In school education, the performance of Neemuch was well. But the performance of Shivpuri was poor with 13% of marks. Ratlam, Agar-Malwa, Betul, and Sheopur also did not perform well in this area.
Gwalior only met 33% of the target in Lakhpati Didi, whereas Singrauli reached 99%.
Singrauli achieved 99% of the goal in executing the Lakhpati Didi Initiative, but Gwalior was only able to reach 33%.
Tikamgarh achieved 93%, Dewas 90%, and Singrauli 99% of the goal under the Central Government's Lakhpati Didi Initiative. However, Barwani only met 43% of the goal, Mauganj 42%, and Gwalior 33%.
